Science doesn’t work despite scientists being asses. Science works, to at least some extent, because scientists are asses. Bickering and backstabbing are essential elements of the process. Haven’t any of these guys ever heard of “peer review”?

There’s this myth in wide circulation: rational, emotionless Vulcans in white coats, plumbing the secrets of the universe, their Scientific Methods unsullied by bias or emotionalism. …

[But science is] not a hippie love-in; it’s rugby. Every time you put out a paper, the guy you pissed off at last year’s Houston conference is gonna be laying in wait. Every time you think you’ve made a breakthrough, that asshole supervisor who told you you needed more data will be standing ready to shoot it down. You want to know how the Human Genome Project finished so far ahead of schedule? Because it was the Human Genome projects, two competing teams locked in bitter rivalry, one led by J. Craig Venter, one by Francis Collins — and from what I hear, those guys did not like each other at all.

This is how it works: you put your model out there in the coliseum, and a bunch of guys in white coats kick the shit out of it. If it’s still alive when the dust clears, your brainchild receives conditional acceptance. It does not get rejected. This time.

Peter Woods on the scientific method.

(via penllawen)

  1. thebarmaiden reblogged this from coyotesqrl
  2. thekeri reblogged this from coyotesqrl
  3. whimsicalities reblogged this from noonday and added:
    slightly different quote)
  4. whileyouweregone reblogged this from penllawen
  5. noonday reblogged this from whileyouweresleeping
  6. davethebrave reblogged this from whileyouweresleeping
  7. coyotesqrl reblogged this from penllawen
  8. sarplus reblogged this from whileyouweresleeping
  9. whileyouweresleeping reblogged this from penllawen
  10. penllawen posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus